Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were liable to service tax on promotional activity for sale of educational CDs, or whether the tax, if any, was payable by the principal and the benefit of Notification No. 14/2004-S.T. dated 10.09.2004 was available.
Analysis: The record showed that the educational materials were supplied by eBIZ, and the appellants were only promoting their sale. On that basis, the activity was treated as a business auxiliary service rendered on behalf of the principal. The exemption notification cited by the appellants was considered applicable to the nature of service involved, and the demand could not be sustained against them.
Conclusion: The service tax demand against the appellants was not sustainable and the tax, if any, was payable by the principal, not the appellants.