Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue's appeal was liable to be dismissed for low tax effect under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, and whether any exception in the amended instructions permitted the appeal to be heard on merits.
Analysis: The disputed tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by Circular No. 3/2018, which was stated to apply retrospectively to pending appeals and was treated as binding on the tax authorities. The case was also found not to fall within any of the exceptions later set out in the CBDT instructions amending para 10 of the circular, including challenges to constitutional validity, illegality of circulars or notifications, revenue audit objections, undisclosed foreign assets, external law-enforcement information, or pending prosecution.
Conclusion: The revenue's appeal was not maintainable on account of low tax effect and was dismissed in limine.