TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are hit by the moratorium under Section 14(1)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; (ii) whether continuation of such proceedings requires the consent or permission of the Interim Resolution Professional.
Issue (i): whether proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are hit by the moratorium under Section 14(1)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: Section 14(1)(a) prohibits suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor, but the expression "proceedings" was construed in the context of the Code as a whole. The moratorium is intended to prevent dissipation, diminution, or recovery-driven depletion of the corporate debtor's assets during the insolvency resolution process. Proceedings which are in the benefit of the corporate debtor and do not amount to debt recovery action or affect its assets were held outside the embargo. Proceedings under Section 34 are antecedent to execution under Section 36 and, by themselves, do not enforce or recover any debt against the corporate debtor.
Conclusion: Proceedings under Section 34 are not barred by Section 14(1)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Issue (ii): whether continuation of such proceedings requires the consent or permission of the Interim Resolution Professional.
Analysis: Since the insolvency process places management with the Interim Resolution Professional under Section 17, the Court considered it appropriate that the professional be informed of the pending proceedings and indicate consent for their continuation, particularly because the objections concerned an award in favour of the corporate debtor and the counterclaim had been rejected.
Conclusion: Consent or permission of the Interim Resolution Professional was required to be obtained and filed before the Court.
Final Conclusion: The section 34 proceedings were permitted to continue, but further continuation was made contingent on filing the Interim Resolution Professional's consent, and the matter was listed for further orders.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 14(1)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 applies only to proceedings against the corporate debtor that would operate as debt recovery or otherwise impair its assets, and does not bar a Section 34 challenge to an award in the corporate debtor's favour.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
