Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether government companies and public sector undertakings could be included as comparables for benchmarking the assessee's international transaction of provision of business support services under the transactional net margin method.
Analysis: Comparability under transfer pricing requires not only functional similarity but also similarity in business environment, assets employed, risks assumed and business model. Applying Rule 10B(2) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 and the principle that comparables must stand on the same platform as the tested party, entities operating under government support, policy-driven control and materially different functions were held to be unsuitable comparables for a captive service provider rendering low-risk business support services on a cost-plus basis. The selected government-owned entities were found to be functionally dissimilar and operating in a different commercial environment.
Conclusion: The government companies and public sector undertakings in dispute were rightly excluded from the final set of comparables, and the transfer pricing adjustment based on them could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For transfer pricing under TNMM, a comparable must be similar not only in function but also in business model, risk profile and operating environment; entities with materially different government-backed operations are not reliable comparables.