1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Successful appeal against penalty under section 271(1)(C) due to deleted additions. CIT(A) order set aside.</h1> The appeal against the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act was successful. The Tribunal had previously deleted the additions on which the penalty ... Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Copy of the order of the Tribunal is placed of the compilation of the assessee and the order of the AO giving effect to the order of the Tribunal. These facts were not disputed by the Revenue. Having carefully examined the order of the Tribunal and the order of the lower authorities, we find that the additions for which penalty under section 271(1)(C) was levied has already been deleted by the Tribunal. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(C) is not sustainable in the eyes of law. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the CIT(A) and delete the penalty. - decided in favour of assessee Issues:1. Appeal against penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act.Detailed Analysis:The appeal was filed by the assessee against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) of the Act, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The counsel for the assessee argued that the additions on which the penalty was levied had been deleted by the Tribunal. It was noted that the Tribunal had indeed deleted the additions in question through its order, which was supported by the order of the Assessing Officer. The Revenue did not dispute these facts, leading to a crucial point in the case.Upon careful examination of the Tribunal's order and the lower authorities' decisions, it was established that the additions for which the penalty was imposed had already been deleted by the Tribunal in its order dated 23.03.2017. Consequently, it was concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(C) was not legally sustainable. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the penalty was deleted, resulting in the allowance of the assessee's appeal.The judgment was pronounced in an open court on 20th July 2018 by Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav, Judicial Member. The detailed analysis highlighted the crucial aspect of the Tribunal's previous order deleting the additions that formed the basis of the penalty, leading to the decision to overturn the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) of the Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
