Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after partition by metes and bounds of the family properties, the sharers could be treated as an association of individuals for the purpose of agricultural income-tax.
Analysis: An association of individuals requires persons to join in a common purpose or common action with the object of producing income, profits or gains. Mere joint cultivation by one member or a common manager, or division of net income among the sharers, is not enough. Where the family properties have been divided by metes and bounds and each member has a specific share, the members do not automatically become an association of individuals. On the facts, there was no evidence of a prior agreement or concerted decision by all the sharers, including the minors, to carry on a joint enterprise for common benefit. The continued management by the father was consistent with family convenience and parental obligation, not with a taxable association.
Conclusion: The sharers were not an association of individuals; the assessment could not be sustained on that basis and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Post-partition management of separately allotted properties by one member and distribution of income among the sharers does not constitute an association of individuals unless there is a proved common purpose or agreement to carry on a joint income-producing venture.