Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum repaid to a bank on premature termination of a fixed deposit, withdrawn for the purpose of investing in shares, was deductible under section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The amount was repaid because the fixed deposit was terminated before maturity so that the funds could be deployed in the purchase of shares. The Court treated this as functionally equivalent to borrowing money for the same investment purpose and paying interest thereon. Since the expenditure was incurred for the purpose of earning income through investment in shares, the necessary nexus under section 57(iii) was established.
Conclusion: The deduction was allowable under section 57(iii) and the question was answered in the affirmative, against the Revenue.