1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal overturns penalty hike by Central Excise, citing Finance Act discretion</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside the penalty enhancement imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise on the appellants, citing discretion ... Comm.(A) enhanced the penalty on the ground that minimum penalty prescribed u/s 76 is Rs. 100 per day – In view of HC decisions, there is discretion in quantum of penalty u/s 76 – Moreover, no reason given for enhancement so penalty cannot e enhanced The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside the penalty enhancement imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise on the appellants, citing discretion in penalty quantum under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found the enhancement not sustainable and allowed the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
