TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands ad expenses issue, deletes excise duty payment addition for 2011-12.</h1> <h3>Dharampal Satyapal Sons (P) Ltd. Versus DCIT, Central Circle-4, New Delhi.</h3> Dharampal Satyapal Sons (P) Ltd. Versus DCIT, Central Circle-4, New Delhi. - TMI Issues:1. Treatment of advertisement expenses as capital in nature under section 37 of the Income Tax Act.2. Allowability of excise duty payment as an expenditure for the Assessment Year 2011-12.Analysis:Issue 1: Treatment of Advertisement ExpensesThe appellant challenged the addition of &8377; 8,48,358 as advertisement expenses treated as capital in nature by the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO disallowed the expenses under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, stating they were not wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) [CIT(A)] confirmed the addition without providing the appellant an opportunity to explain their contentions. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO to verify the nature and genuineness of the expenses based on the Franchise Agreement dated 02.04.2010.Issue 2: Allowability of Excise Duty PaymentThe appellant contested the disallowance of &8377; 95,90,000 excise duty payment, claiming it was a crystallized liability before the due date for filing returns. The AO held the liability was not crystallized by the end of the financial year 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the provision for the liability was created during the relevant financial year, and the payment was made before the due date. Citing the decision in CIT vs Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that in a tax-neutral scenario with uniform tax rates, the excise duty payment should be allowed as an expenditure for the Assessment Year 2011-12. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition on this count.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the advertisement expenses issue to the AO for further examination and directing the deletion of the excise duty payment addition for the Assessment Year 2011-12.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
