High Court reviews international transaction order, grants depreciation, upholds correct rate. Appeals disposed, parties to appear before Tribunal.

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order regarding the treatment of advertisement expenditure as an international transaction for adjustment in arms length pricing, directing a reevaluation based on relevant precedents. Entitlement to depreciation under Section 32 was granted for the balance written down value, following a favorable decision in a similar case. The correct rate of depreciation on certain assets was upheld against the Revenue's challenge. The appeals were disposed of, with pending applications deemed infructuous, and parties were directed to appear before the Tribunal for further proceedings.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Treatment of advertisement, marketing, and sale promotion expenditure as an international transaction for adjustment in arms length pricing.
2. Entitlement to depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the balance written down value relating to a specific unit.
3. Correct rate of depreciation on UPS, printers, and switches.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Treatment of Advertisement Expenditure
The first issue raised pertains to whether the advertisement and marketing expenditure incurred by the appellant assessee can be treated as an international transaction and made subject to adjustment in arms length pricing. The High Court, after considering the arguments of both parties, decided to set aside the Tribunal's order based on the decision in Sony Ericson Mobile Communication India Private Limited v. CIT. The Court directed the Tribunal to reevaluate the issue in light of the directions provided in the aforementioned decision. The assessee was allowed to rely on subsequent decisions by other courts, and the Revenue was granted the opportunity to present their arguments.

Issue 2: Entitlement to Depreciation
The second question raised by the assessee concerns the entitlement to depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the balance written down value related to a specific unit. The Court referred to a previous decision in ITA Nos. 13/2012 and 14/2012, Sony India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT, where the issue was decided in favor of the assessee against the Revenue. Following this precedent, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee on this issue as well.

Issue 3: Correct Rate of Depreciation
The third issue raised by the Revenue questioned the correct rate of depreciation on UPS, printers, and switches, specifically regarding the allowance of depreciation at 60% instead of the normal rate of 15%. The Court cited a previous decision in CIT vs. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., where a similar issue was decided against the Revenue. Consequently, the substantial question of law was answered against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee.

In conclusion, the appeals were disposed of, and all pending applications were deemed infructuous. The parties were directed to appear before the Tribunal on a specified date for further proceedings, aiming to expedite the resolution of the matter.

---