TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner-accused was entitled to bail in a prosecution under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Analysis: The petition was considered on the basis that the alleged seizure was of ganja below commercial quantity, the forensic laboratory report had not been received despite delay in forwarding the sample, and the prosecution case required expert opinion to substantiate the allegation. The petitioner also relied on parity with co-accused who had already been granted bail, and undertook to comply with conditions. The alleged offences were not punishable with death or imprisonment for life.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner on conditions.
TaxTMI 
