Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dealers opting for compounding under Section 8(b) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were liable to separate assessment of manufactured sand produced through VSI/HSI machines not reckoned for compounding.
Analysis: The compounding scheme under Section 8(b) was held to compute tax on the basis of specified crushing machines used in producing granite metal. The provision contemplated exemption from separate assessment in respect of manufactured sand generated in the course of that production. The fact that VSI/HSI machines were also used to shape or further process the material did not alter the position, because those machines were not among the machines taken into account for compounding under the then-existing provision. The later amendment introducing specific rates for VSI/HSI machines was treated as substantive and prospective, supporting the conclusion that such machines were not intended to be covered earlier.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to exemption from separate assessment for the manufactured sand produced through VSI/HSI machines, and the demand notices and assessment orders were unsustainable.