Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ferro-manganese is outside the definition of 'mineral' and 'mine' under the M.P. Electricity Duty Act, 1949, and whether the petitioner's classification as a deemed mine for levy of higher electricity duty is ultra vires.
Analysis: Manganese ore is a mineral, and the activity carried on by the petitioner involves processing of that mineral, after which ferro-manganese comes into existence as an alloy. The activity of processing manganese is specifically covered by the statutory scheme governing electricity duty, including explanation (b) appended to Part B of Section 3. On that basis, the classification adopted for the purpose of electricity duty was not arbitrary or illegal.
Conclusion: The challenge to the classification failed. Ferro-manganese production from manganese ore remained within the scope of the duty provisions, and the petitioner was not entitled to the declaration sought.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory scheme treats processing of a mineral as a taxable activity, the subsequent emergence of an alloy does not take the activity outside the ambit of the electricity duty classification.