1957 (9) TMI 84 - HC - Income Tax

Bamboo, thatch, and timber for tea business deemed agricultural income under Bengal Tax Act

DOOARS TEA CO. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL

DOOARS TEA CO. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL - [1958] 34 ITR 786 (Cal) Issues Involved:1. Whether bamboo, thatch, and fuel timber grown and utilized by the assessee company constitute agricultural income under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act.2. Whether such income can be computed under Rule 4 of the Rules framed under the Act.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Agricultural Income DefinitionThe primary issue was whether bamboo, thatch, and fuel timber grown by the assessee company and utilized for its own benefit in its tea business constituted agricultural income under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act. The assessee argued that agricultural produce grown on one's own land and used for personal purposes does not constitute income unless sold. The Department, however, contended that such produce is agricultural income regardless of sale.The court analyzed the definition of 'agricultural income' under Section 2(1)(b) of the Act, which includes income derived from agricultural land by agriculture. The court found that the Act treats agricultural produce itself as agricultural income, irrespective of whether it is sold. The court stated that agricultural produce derived from land is itself treated by the Act as constituting agricultural income, chargeable to tax. The court rejected the assessee's argument that agricultural produce must be sold to constitute income, emphasizing that income need not be in money but can be in money's worth, including income in kind.Issue 2: Computation of Income under Rule 4The second issue was whether the market value of agricultural produce that is not sold can be computed under Rule 4 of the Rules framed under the Act. The assessee argued that Rule 4 applies only to produce that has been sold, either in the market or otherwise, and does not cover produce that has not been sold at all.The court examined Rule 4, which provides methods for determining the market value of agricultural produce for the purposes of the Act. The court held that Rule 4 applies to all agricultural produce, whether sold or not. The court noted that the rule's opening words, 'For the purposes of the Act,' indicate its general applicability. The court concluded that the rule provides a method for computing the market value of agricultural produce even if it has not been sold, thus allowing for the taxation of such produce as agricultural income.Conclusion:The court answered both questions in the affirmative:1. Question 1: Yes, bamboo, thatch, and fuel timber grown by the assessee company and utilized for its own benefit in its tea business constitute agricultural income under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act.2. Question 2: Yes, such income can be computed under Rule 4 of the Rules framed under the Act.The Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax, West Bengal, was awarded the costs of the reference, including the costs of the previous hearing.