TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Illegal Re-Assessment Initiation Quashed, Short-Term Gains Deletion Upheld</h1> <h3>Shri Jagat Singh Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 (3), Income Tax Office, Ghaziabad.</h3> Shri Jagat Singh Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 (3), Income Tax Office, Ghaziabad. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Initiation of re-assessment proceedings under section 147 of the I.T. Act.2. Addition of Rs. 37,91,000/- on account of short-term capital gains.Detailed Analysis:1. Initiation of Re-assessment Proceedings under Section 147 of the I.T. Act:The Assessee challenged the initiation of re-assessment proceedings. The case was reopened under section 147 based on AIR information that the assessee sold immovable property worth Rs. 65,84,000/- during the assessment year 2008-2009. The A.O. issued a notice under section 148 on 17.03.2015 after the assessee failed to respond to multiple queries. The A.O. believed that the capital gains from the sale of the property had escaped assessment.The Tribunal noted that the A.O. did not mention the PAN of the assessee and incorrectly stated the sale consideration as Rs. 65,84,000/-, which was actually Rs. 20 lakhs. The A.O. also incorrectly mentioned that the assessee had not filed a return of income, while the assessee had filed the return on 22.10.2008. The property was situated 13 KM away from the municipal limits of Dadri Nagar Palika Parishad, supported by a certificate from the Tehsildar. The A.O. did not provide evidence that the property fell within 8 KM of the municipal limits.The Tribunal found that the A.O. recorded non-existent and incorrect reasons for reopening the assessment. The A.O. did not verify the AIR information and formed his opinion based on incorrect facts and assumptions. The Tribunal relied on the decisions of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Pr. CIT vs. GANDG Pharma India Ltd., and Pr. CIT vs. Meenakshi Overseas Pvt. Ltd., which emphasize the necessity of a tangible link between the information and the belief that income has escaped assessment.The Tribunal concluded that the initiation of re-assessment proceedings was illegal and without basis, quashing the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148 of the I.T. Act.2. Addition of Rs. 37,91,000/- on Account of Short-term Capital Gains:The A.O. computed the short-term capital gain at Rs. 37,91,000/- by taking the sale consideration under section 50C at Rs. 45,84,000/- and excluding the cost of acquisition and stamp duty. The assessee contended that the property was sold for Rs. 20 lakhs, not Rs. 65,84,000/-, and provided a certificate from the Tehsildar confirming the property's distance from the municipal limits.The Tribunal observed that the A.O. did not provide evidence to contradict the Tehsildar's certificate and failed to verify the AIR information. The A.O.'s reasons for reopening the assessment were based on incorrect and non-existent facts, leading to an invalid assumption of jurisdiction.Since the initiation of re-assessment proceedings was quashed, the addition of Rs. 37,91,000/- on account of short-term capital gains was also deleted. The Tribunal did not address the remaining grounds on merit, considering them academic.Conclusion:The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, quashing the re-assessment proceedings and deleting the addition of Rs. 37,91,000/-. The Tribunal pronounced the order in the open court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
