Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal's Decision Upheld: Excess Amount Demanded by Zamorin = Agricultural Income</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Versus K.C. Manavikraman Rajah</h3> The High Court of Madras upheld the Tribunal's decision that the excess amount demanded by the Zamorin of Calicut from tenants is considered agricultural ... - The High Court of Madras held that the excess amount of Rs. 3,500 demanded by the Zamorin of Calicut from his tenants before granting lease renewals is considered agricultural income under Section 2(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, citing a similar case from the Patna High Court. The Commissioner was ordered to pay the costs of the reference, Rs. 250.