Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court dismisses appeal, affirms no relief for appellant, upholds quashing of State Government's order.</h1> <h3>Property Agents Versus Shamsher Bahadur and Ors.</h3> The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming that the appellant had no right to claim any relief in the special appeal. The court upheld the learned ... - Issues Involved:1. Validity of the lease executed on July 31, 1958.2. Jurisdiction of the Rent Control and Eviction Officer to review or cancel orders.3. Nature of the order passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer on January 17, 1959.4. Jurisdiction of the State Government to restore a void order.5. Validity of the sub-lease executed on October 12, 1958.6. Rights of the appellant under the lease and sub-lease.7. Locus standi of the appellant to maintain the appeal.Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of the lease executed on July 31, 1958:The appellant argued that the lease executed by respondent No. 3 on July 31, 1958, was a valid lease, making the appellant legally a tenant of the accommodation. The court assumed the lease's validity for argument's sake but noted that the lease was executed in violation of a general order under Section 7(2) of the U.P. Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, and thus rendered the execution of the lease a criminal offense under Section 8 of the Act.2. Jurisdiction of the Rent Control and Eviction Officer to review or cancel orders:The court held that the Rent Control and Eviction Officer had no jurisdiction to review or cancel the quasi-judicial order made on January 17, 1959, under Section 7(2) of the Act. The order of February 19, 1959, reviewing and canceling the January 17, 1959, order was void and ineffective. The State Government also had no power or jurisdiction to restore the void order.3. Nature of the order passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer on January 17, 1959:The court determined that the order of January 17, 1959, was a quasi-judicial order. The Rent Control and Eviction Officer had to decide several questions, including whether the accommodation was new or old, whether the Act applied to it, whether respondent No. 3 was liable for prosecution under Section 8, and whether Shamsher Bahadur was liable to eviction under Section 7-A. These questions required the officer to act in a judicial or quasi-judicial manner.4. Jurisdiction of the State Government to restore a void order:The court held that the State Government had no jurisdiction to restore a void order passed without jurisdiction. The State Government's order of February 8, 1960, restoring the February 19, 1959, order was without jurisdiction and was rightly quashed by the learned single Judge.5. Validity of the sub-lease executed on October 12, 1958:The sub-lease executed by the appellant in favor of Shamsher Bahadur was invalid and ineffective as it was made in defiance of the provisions of the Act, specifically Section 7(3). The Full Bench decision cited by the appellant did not apply to this sub-lease as it directly offended a provision of the Act itself.6. Rights of the appellant under the lease and sub-lease:The appellant's rights under the lease dated July 31, 1958, and the sub-lease dated October 12, 1958, were extinguished by the valid order of January 17, 1959, directing respondent No. 3 to let out the accommodation to Shamsher Bahadur. The appellant had no legal contractual relationship with the accommodation after the January 17, 1959, order.7. Locus standi of the appellant to maintain the appeal:The court noted that the appellant had no locus standi to maintain the appeal as it had submitted to the order of the Rent Control and Eviction Officer dated March 19, 1959. The appellant did not prefer any revision to the State Government against this order and had no right to complain against the quashing of the State Government's order dated February 8, 1960.Conclusion:The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming that the appellant had no right to claim any relief in the special appeal. The court upheld the learned single Judge's decision to quash the State Government's order and restore the order of January 17, 1959, allotting the accommodation to Shamsher Bahadur.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found