Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 42(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 applies to profits that actually accrue or arise in British India so as to override Section 4(1)(c) and confine taxation only to the portion attributable to operations carried out in British India.
Analysis: Section 4(1)(c) distinguishes between income that actually accrues or arises in British India and income that is deemed to accrue or arise there. Section 42(1) creates a deeming rule for specified classes of income connected with British India, and Section 42(3) grants proportionate relief only in cases where profits are deemed under Section 42 to accrue or arise in British India. The relief under Section 42(3) does not extend to income which is found on the facts to have actually accrued or arisen in British India. The statutory scheme does not permit Section 42 to displace the first limb of Section 4(1)(c).
Conclusion: Section 42(3) does not apply to profits which actually accrue or arise in British India and cannot override Section 4(1)(c) in the manner suggested by the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee and the profits were held taxable without invoking the apportionment relief under Section 42(3).
Ratio Decidendi: Relief under Section 42(3) is confined to profits deemed to accrue or arise in British India under Section 42 and is unavailable where income is held to have actually accrued or arisen there.