Reopening notice under income-tax law invalid where no definite information supported escapement of income

The reopening notice under Section 34 was held invalid because the statutory condition of escapement of income in consequence of definite information was not satisfied. The record showed that the alleged underassessment related only to the Madras branch, and the Tribunal had already found that the Income-tax Officer had that branch in mind when the original assessment was completed. As no other definite information was shown to have formed the basis of the notice, the jurisdictional requirement for action under Section 34 was absent. The notice was therefore not tenable in law, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the notice issued under Section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act on 29 July 1939 was valid in law.

Analysis: The reference turned on whether the reopening of the assessment satisfied the statutory condition that the Income-tax Officer must discover escapement of income in consequence of definite information coming into his possession. On the facts found, the only basis for the notice was the alleged partial escapement of income arising from the Madras branch, while the Tribunal had found that the officer already had that branch in mind when the earlier assessment was completed. As no other definite information was shown to have been the foundation of the notice, the statutory condition for action under the new Section 34 was not met.

Conclusion: The notice under Section 34 was not tenable in law and the answer to the first question was in favour of the assessee.

---