Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in an assessment made under the proviso to section 13, the Assistant Commissioner and the Commissioner had authority to alter the Income-tax Officer's basis of profit and enhance the percentage rate adopted for computation.
Analysis: The proviso to section 13 was held to confer discretion on the Income-tax Officer as to the basis and manner of computation, but not to make that basis immune from scrutiny in appeal. The appellate powers under sections 31 and 32 were construed broadly. It was accepted that where the Income-tax Officer adopts a permissible method, the higher departmental authorities may still examine whether the method or percentage used is proper and may substitute a different basis if the statute empowers enhancement of the assessment. The power to enhance an assessment was treated as wide enough to include alteration of the rate applied to sales when that is the method chosen for computing income.
Conclusion: The Assistant Commissioner and the Commissioner did have authority to change the basis of profit and enhance the percentage rate.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment made under the proviso to section 13 is subject to appellate interference, and the appellate authorities may enhance the assessment by altering the basis or rate of computation where the Income-tax Act confers wide powers of review and enhancement.