TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds Commissioner's decisions on income sources, Modvat, Canvat, and interest disallowance.</h1> <h3>D.C.I.T., Circle 1, Meerut Versus Baghpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd.</h3> D.C.I.T., Circle 1, Meerut Versus Baghpat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Addition of accrued interest income under 'Income from other sources'.2. Treatment of Modvat and Canvat receivable as taxable income.3. Disallowance of interest under section 43B(d) of the IT Act.Analysis:1. The first issue pertains to the addition of accrued interest income of Rs. 85,50,000 under 'Income from other sources'. The Assessing Officer (AO) added this amount to the income of the assessee, but the assessee contended that it was accounted for in the ledger and offered as income. The Tribunal found that the interest expenses were correctly accounted for, and the Commissioner rightly deleted the addition. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.2. The second issue revolves around the treatment of Modvat and Canvat receivable as taxable income. The AO added Rs. 10,62,647 to the income, considering it as receivable claim. However, the Tribunal noted that these were advance excise deposits, appearing in the balance sheet as current assets. The Commissioner correctly deleted this addition, as it was not taxable income. The Tribunal dismissed this ground of appeal.3. The final issue concerns the disallowance of interest under section 43B(d) of the IT Act. The AO disallowed Rs. 7,47,49,740 of interest, as it was not paid by the due date of filing the return. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision where it was held that certain lenders did not fall under the definition of public financial institutions. As the interest was payable to government entities, section 43B(d) did not apply. Following this precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Commissioner's decision.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decisions on all three issues, dismissing the Revenue's appeal in its entirety.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
