TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gratuity payments made to the widow of a deceased superintendent and to a superintendent on termination of employment were allowable deductions as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of deriving agricultural income under section 5(j) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950.
Analysis: The deductible expenditure provision requires a real connection between the payment and the purpose of earning agricultural income. A voluntary payment may qualify only if it is made on grounds of commercial expediency and is shown to facilitate the carrying on of the business. The earlier income-tax cases relied upon drew a distinction between payments made under a gratuity practice or expectation known to employees and mere ex gratia or gift payments. On the facts, there was no material to show any established practice, any employee expectation, any effect on salary, or any nexus between the payments and the future conduct of the business. The amounts were therefore treated as voluntary payments made in recognition of past service and not as business expenditure.
Conclusion: The gratuity payments were not allowable as deductions under section 5(j); the question was answered in the negative, against the assessee and in favour of the department.
TaxTMI 
