Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ of mandamus could be issued to enforce an Appellate Tribunal's direction made in respect of a concluded earlier assessment year, and whether that direction was within the Tribunal's jurisdiction under the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The petition invoked article 226 to compel compliance with the Tribunal's direction. The Tribunal had purported to act under section 35(2), but that provision was inapplicable because the prescribed period of limitation had expired. The Tribunal's power under section 33(4) was confined to passing orders in the appeal then before it and did not extend to giving directions concerning assessment proceedings of an earlier year that had already concluded. If relief against the earlier assessment year was sought, the proper course was to pursue the statutory remedy of requiring a reference under section 66.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's direction was without jurisdiction, and no legal right existed to sustain a mandamus for its enforcement. The petition was therefore not maintainable and failed.
Final Conclusion: The extraordinary writ jurisdiction could not be used to enforce an order made beyond the Tribunal's statutory powers, and the assessee was left without relief in the petition.
Ratio Decidendi: Mandamus cannot be issued to enforce an order made without jurisdiction, and the Appellate Tribunal's power under section 33(4) does not extend to directing relief in respect of a concluded assessment year outside the appeal before it.