Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether repayment of excess profits tax under section 11(11) of the Indian Finance Act, 1946, constituted business income so as to attract relief under section 25(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The repayment under section 11(11) was not treated by the Court as a continuation of the assessee's business receipts. The provision used different language from the proviso to section 12 of the Excess Profits Tax Act, which expressly treated repayments as business profits, and the absence of such language in section 11(11) was significant. The repayment arose from a statutory concession linked to the deposit scheme under section 10 of the Indian Finance Act, 1942, and not from any business activity or trading source. The amount was therefore characterised as a statutory income, falling within the residuary head rather than business income.
Conclusion: The repayment was not business income and section 25(4) did not apply.
Final Conclusion: The question referred was answered against the assessee, and the repayment of excess profits tax was held taxable as statutory income in the hands of the recipient.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory repayment received under a fiscal concession is not business income unless the governing provision expressly deems it to be so; in the absence of such deeming language, it is taxable as statutory income under the residuary head and does not attract business-specific relief.