Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount standing in the balance-sheet as capital paid in surplus represented premium realised from the issue of shares within Schedule II, rule 3 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947. (ii) Whether the capital paid in surplus, though not derived from taxed profits, could be treated as a reserve under Schedule II, rule 2 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947. (iii) Whether the amounts shown as earned surplus in the relevant years were reserves within Schedule II, rule 2 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947.
Issue (i): Whether the amount standing in the balance-sheet as capital paid in surplus represented premium realised from the issue of shares within Schedule II, rule 3 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947.
Analysis: Premium is not confined to cash received on issue of shares. Where shares are issued for consideration other than cash and the value of the assets received exceeds the face value of the shares, the excess may properly be treated as premium. The amount had been credited as capital paid in surplus and had remained undisturbed for years, reflecting the character of a surplus arising on the issue of shares.
Conclusion: Yes. The amount constituted premium realised from the issue of shares.
Issue (ii): Whether the capital paid in surplus, though not derived from taxed profits, could be treated as a reserve under Schedule II, rule 2 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947.
Analysis: The expression reserve was construed according to its ordinary meaning. Rule 2 excluded only reserves which had been allowed in computing profits under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. A surplus created before or outside such allowances was not disqualified merely because it had not arisen from taxed profits. The long-standing treatment of the amount as a separate surplus supported its character as a reserve.
Conclusion: Yes. The amount could be treated as a reserve notwithstanding that it was not built up out of taxed profits.
Issue (iii): Whether the amounts shown as earned surplus in the relevant years were reserves within Schedule II, rule 2 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947.
Analysis: The relevant balances were not a mere unallocated profit balance. The findings showed that substantial portions of yearly profits were retained in the business and used for expansion, with appropriations and reinvestment indicating that the sums had been set apart in substance as reserves. Formal nomenclature was not decisive; the substance of the accounting treatment controlled.
Conclusion: Yes. The earned surplus amounts were reserves within rule 2.
Final Conclusion: All three reference questions were answered in the affirmative, with the assessee succeeding on the treatment of both the capital paid in surplus and the earned surplus for computation of capital under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: For computing capital under Schedule II of the Business Profits Tax Act, a surplus arising on issue of shares for non-cash consideration may amount to share premium, and accumulated balances retained in and used for the business may constitute reserves even without formal designation or origin from taxed profits, unless specifically excluded by the governing income-tax computation rules.