Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest which became due to a money-lending firm during the year of account, but was not received in cash or by adjustment in the accounts, was taxable as income or profits under the Income-tax Act, VII of 1918.
Analysis: The Act applies to income derived from business and the taxable profits of a business are to be computed under the statutory scheme. The judgments treated the controlling question as whether a sum merely becoming due could be treated as income without receipt or its legal equivalent. The Chief Justice and other judges examined the ordinary meaning of income, the statutory language of accrual, receipt and business profits, and the English authorities on receipts, profits and constructive receipt. The reasoning accepted that actual cash receipt is not indispensable, but mere accrual of a debt does not by itself make the amount taxable unless there is receipt, adjustment, or a form of constructive receipt that places the money under the assessee's control.
Conclusion: Interest that had merely accrued due, but had not been realized in cash or by adjustment, was not taxable on that footing alone. The reference was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.