Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum received under the settlement dated 7 July 1837 constituted agricultural income as rent or revenue derived from land within section 2(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and was therefore exempt from tax.
Analysis: The settlement divested the assessee's predecessors of all rights in the land but conferred in perpetuity a right to receive one-fourth of the net land revenue collections after deducting tahsil expenses. The right created was not a mere allowance or pension payable out of any funds at large, nor a fixed sum calculated by reference to revenue. The source of the receipt remained the land revenue itself, and the Government, in collecting and passing on that one-fourth share, acted only as collector of the revenue to which the assessee was entitled. The receipt therefore fell within agricultural income under the statutory definition.
Conclusion: The sum was agricultural income and was not liable to tax; the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a settlement confers a direct and continuing right to receive a share of land revenue itself, the receipt retains the character of agricultural income, even if the landholder's original rights in the land have been extinguished and the amount is collected by the Government before being paid over.