1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Dispute on MODVAT Credit Treatment under Section 145A: Accounting Methods Impact on Profit</h1> The case involves a dispute over the treatment of MODVAT credit following the introduction of Section 145A. The appellant advocates for the inclusive ... - Issues involved: Treatment of MODVAT credit in relation to accounting methods.Summary:The appeal concerns the treatment of MODVAT credit in light of the introduction of Section 145A u/s 01.04.1999. The appellant argues for the inclusive method of accounting, while the assessee has been following the exclusive method. The respondent, citing the Guidance Note from the Institute of Chartered Accountants, contends that the choice of accounting method does not impact the profit and loss statement.The respondent asserts that any questions raised by the revenue would be of academic interest and would not affect the tax liability. When pressed for clarification on the tax implications of different accounting methods, the appellant's counsel requested time to review the Tax Audit Report for relevant figures.The matter is adjourned for further consideration on 11.03.2010.