Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation paid for cancellation of contracts to purchase machinery was capital expenditure and therefore disallowable as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The payment was made to cancel proposed purchases of machinery which the assessee had decided not to use in its business. The controlling test applied was whether the expenditure was related to the actual carrying on of the business or to the means of carrying on the business. Expenditure that secures an advantage of an enduring nature or is connected with the acquisition or abandonment of a capital asset is capital in character, whereas an outlay connected with the operations of the business is revenue in character. On the facts, the cancellation payments were made to avoid a liability arising from the proposed acquisition of machinery and not in the course of the business operations themselves.
Conclusion: The compensation was rightly treated as capital expenditure and the deduction was correctly disallowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred in connection with the acquisition or abandonment of a capital asset, or otherwise relating to the means of carrying on business rather than its operations, is capital in nature and is not deductible as revenue expenditure.