Court orders refund of seized amount with interest to petitioner, imposes costs on Revenue for wrongful withholding.

The Court directed the respondents to refund the seized amount of Rs. 13,51,714 to the petitioner with interest from a specified date. The Court found that there was no justification for withholding the balance amount after the tax liability was settled, emphasizing that the petitioner was entitled to the refund. A timeline of four weeks was set for the refund, and costs were imposed on the Revenue for wrongfully withholding the amount, leading to the necessity of the writ petition.

---

---

Issues:
Petition for refund of seized amount with interest under Section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner sought a writ for the refund of a seized amount of Rs. 13,51,714 along with interest under Section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The cash was seized from the petitioner's wife during a search operation, and a portion was withheld by the Department. The petitioner contended that after the assessment order was passed, there was no tax liability, and thus, the balance amount should have been returned.

2. The petitioner's advocate argued that retaining the amount of Rs. 13,51,714 after the tax liability was adjusted and subsequent deletion of the addition by the CIT [A] was illegal and arbitrary. The advocate emphasized that there was no tax liability, and the petitioner was entitled to the balance amount along with interest from the date of the assessment order.

3. On the other hand, the Revenue's advocate stated that the tax liability was determined based on the addition made by the Assessing Officer. However, after the CIT [A] deleted the addition and the Department refunded a portion of the seized amount, the balance amount was to be returned. The Revenue mentioned that the petitioner would be entitled to interest from the date of the Tribunal's order dismissing the appeal.

4. The Court noted that after the assessment order, the tax liability was adjusted, and there was no further amount due from the petitioner. The CIT [A] had deleted the addition, and the Department had refunded a portion of the seized amount. Despite this, the balance amount of Rs. 13,51,714 was not returned to the petitioner, leading to the Court directing the respondents to refund the said amount with interest from a specified date.

5. The Court held that there was no justification for withholding the balance amount after the tax liability was settled. The respondents were directed to return the amount with interest, and a timeline of four weeks was set for the refund. The Court also imposed costs on the Revenue for wrongfully withholding the amount and necessitating the writ petition.

This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key arguments presented by both parties and the Court's decision in favor of the petitioner for the refund of the seized amount with interest.

---