Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was governed by the law in force on the date of the original return or by the amended provisions applicable from 1 April 1968, where the penalty proceedings arose from a return filed in response to notice under section 148.
Analysis: The reference was decided in the light of the principle that, where penalty proceedings are initiated in connection with a return filed pursuant to notice under section 148, the default is attributable to that return and not to the return filed in the original assessment proceedings. The applicable law for penalty is the law in force on the date when the wrongful act is committed, not the earlier law governing the original assessment year. On that basis, the amended provisions of section 271(1)(c) were held applicable.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was not justified in cancelling the penalty on the footing that the amended provisions of section 271(1)(c) did not apply; the answer was returned in the negative, against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For penalty proceedings linked to a return filed in response to notice under section 148, the relevant default is attributable to that return and the penalty is governed by the law in force when the wrongful act is committed.