TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a Hindu widow's right to a share on a partition of coparcenary property is a right in the property and survives the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. (ii) Whether, on the deemed partition under the Explanation to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the widow is entitled to her share in addition to succession to the deceased coparcener's interest.
Issue (i): Whether a Hindu widow's right to a share on a partition of coparcenary property is a right in the property and survives the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Analysis: The widow's entitlement to a share at partition was treated as a substantive proprietary right and not as a mere personal claim for maintenance. Section 4 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and Section 4 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, did not abrogate that right, because the relevant pre-existing Hindu law principles were not inconsistent with any provision made by those enactments. The earlier view that the widow's partition share was extinguished could not be accepted.
Conclusion: The widow's right to a share at partition continued as a right in the coparcenary property and was not displaced by the cited enactments.
Issue (ii): Whether, on the deemed partition under the Explanation to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the widow is entitled to her share in addition to succession to the deceased coparcener's interest.
Analysis: The Explanation to Section 6 creates a legal fiction that the deceased coparcener's interest is to be ascertained as if a partition had taken place immediately before death. That fiction must be carried to its logical conclusion, so that all consequences of the assumed partition are given effect. Accordingly, where the widow would have been entitled to a share on such partition, her share cannot be ignored while computing the deceased's notional share for succession. The plaintiff therefore took one-third on notional partition and a further share through succession, resulting in a half share overall on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The widow was entitled to have her partition share recognised in addition to succession to the deceased coparcener's interest, and her total share was one-half.
Final Conclusion: The decree below was modified by granting the plaintiff a one-half share in the suit property, with partition to be worked out accordingly and costs left to each party.
Ratio Decidendi: A legal fiction of notional partition under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 must be given full effect, including the widow's substantive share on partition, unless the statute expressly excludes that consequence.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
