Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received for meeting the expenses of managing and running the retail cloth shop was exempt under section 4(3)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, including the surplus over actual expenditure.
Analysis: The provision exempts a special allowance, benefit or perquisite specifically granted to meet expenses wholly and necessarily incurred in the performance of duties. The decisive factor is whether the amount was granted for that purpose, not whether the assessee actually spent the whole amount or whether the grant exactly matched the expenditure. The Tribunal's finding that the amount was received for reimbursing advertisement and other expenses was binding, and the section did not require proof that the whole sum was actually expended.
Conclusion: The entire amount received, including the surplus over actual expenditure, was exempt under section 4(3)(vi).