Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dividend deemed to have been distributed under section 22 of the East African Income Tax (Management) Act, 1952 could be treated as income "paid" to or for the benefit of a child within section 24 so as to tax the settlor on that amount.
Analysis: Section 22 created a limited fiction for the specific purpose of taxing undistributed company profits by deeming a dividend distribution to shareholders and including the shareholder's proportionate share in that shareholder's total income. Section 24, by contrast, applied only where income was in fact paid to or for the benefit of a child under a settlement, and it attributed such income to the settlor. The two provisions operated as independent charging provisions and could not be treated as a single coordinated scheme. The deemed dividend under section 22 could not be imported into section 24, because the fiction created for one section could not alter the natural meaning of "paid" in the other. The surrounding provisions also supported that construction, since they were framed around actual payment and the machinery of assessment that followed a real or section-specific deemed distribution.
Conclusion: The deemed dividend under section 22 was not a "payment" within section 24. The appeal was allowed and the assessments were to be amended accordingly.