1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Jurisdiction for Penalty Imposition Determined by Law at Initiation of Proceedings</h1> The High Court of Kerala held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to impose a penalty under section 271(1)(c) in a case where ... Authority Competent To Impose Penalty, Effect Of Amendment Of S. 274(2), Penalty The High Court of Kerala ruled that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to impose the penalty under section 271(1)(c) in a case where penalty proceedings were initiated before the amendment by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975. The Tribunal's view that the date of filing the return was the material date for determining the authority's competence was deemed incorrect. The court held that the authority's competence should be determined with reference to the law in force on the date of initiation of the penalty proceedings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
