Petitioner wins against additional tax imposition, can challenge investigation independently The Bombay HC ruled on 6th July, 2007, that respondents cannot impose additional tax on the petitioner. The petitioner can conduct lawful business without ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petitioner wins against additional tax imposition, can challenge investigation independently
The Bombay HC ruled on 6th July, 2007, that respondents cannot impose additional tax on the petitioner. The petitioner can conduct lawful business without hindrance but not unlawful activities. Respondents' investigation, including computer seizure, can continue. Petitioner can challenge independently. Case to be grouped with others on 6th July, 2007.
The Bombay High Court issued an order on 6th July, 2007, stating that the respondents cannot levy or collect further tax from the petitioner. The petitioner is allowed to continue their lawful business without obstruction, but unlawful business is not permitted. The investigation by the respondents, including the seizure of computers, is allowed to proceed. The petitioner can challenge the action independently. The case is to be placed along with a group of matters on 6th July, 2007.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
