Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice under section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 was valid where the assessee had voluntarily filed a return under section 22(3) before assessment and the return had been ignored without any decision.
Analysis: A return filed voluntarily before assessment falls within section 22(3), even if it is a loss return and even if it is filed belatedly. The requirement of section 34 is attracted only where there has been omission or failure by the assessee leading to escaped assessment. Where the assessee has already filed a return and the Income-tax Officer has merely ignored it without passing any order on it, the case is not one of escaped assessment. The fact that the return was not one qualifying for carry forward under section 22(2A) did not justify treating it as non-existent for the purpose of section 34.
Conclusion: The notice under section 34, insofar as it related to the assessment year 1952-53, was invalid and was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: A voluntarily filed return under section 22(3), if ignored by the department without adjudication, negatives the existence of escaped assessment and cannot sustain a notice under section 34.