Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 31,250 received by the assessee on the liquidation of the company was rightly taxed in the assessment year 1947-48.
Analysis: The amount represented the difference between the shareholder's subscribed capital and the share of assets distributed on liquidation. The Tribunal characterised the amount alternatively as dividend under section 2(6A)(c) or as capital gains under section 12B. Section 12B applies to the company's own capital gain and does not operate to tax the shareholder on the company's sale of its capital assets. If treated as a distribution under section 2(6A)(c), the proviso to that sub-clause limits inclusion to accumulated profits arising in the six previous years of the company preceding the date of liquidation. The company's realisation occurred on 31 March 1947, so only accumulated profits of the six accounting years of the company prior to the year ending 31 March 1947 fall within the proviso. The fact that the dividend accrued to the assessee in his accounting year ending 12 April 1947 is not material to the scope of the proviso, which is tied to the company's years preceding the date of liquidation.
Conclusion: The questioned sum of Rs. 31,250 was not rightly taxed in the assessment year 1947-48; decision is in favour of the assessee.