Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice for reassessment of escaped income could be issued beyond eight years where the escaped income was below the prescribed monetary threshold and the Central Board of Revenue had not considered the matter, notwithstanding that the notice was said to be in consequence of a direction contained in an appellate order.
Analysis: The proviso to section 34(1) introduced safeguards where the bar of limitation was removed, including that no notice could be issued for escaped income aggregating to less than the prescribed amount after eight years and that the Central Board of Revenue had to be satisfied, on recorded reasons, that the case was fit for notice beyond that period. The notice in question related to escaped income below that threshold and there was no consideration by the Central Board of Revenue. The fact that the notice was stated to be in consequence of a direction in an appellate order did not displace the safeguards in the proviso, because a notice issued beyond eight years still had to satisfy those conditions.
Conclusion: The notice was invalid and the challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Reassessment proceedings could not be sustained where the statutory safeguards attached to notices beyond the relevant period were not complied with, even if the notice was linked to an appellate direction.
Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment notice issued beyond the extended period must satisfy the statutory conditions in the proviso to section 34(1), and a purported appellate direction does not override those conditions.