Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the partition of a Hindu undivided family's money-lending business resulted in a discontinuance of the business so as to attract Section 25(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The relevant test was whether there was a complete cessation of the business, not a mere change of ownership. The partition divided a single joint family business into separate parts, breaking its unity and legal integrity. The fact that the father continued the business with the allotted assets, using the same books, premises, goodwill, or customers, did not preserve the identity of the old business. On partition, the business which had been assessed as one unit came to an end in law and the continuing activities of the father were treated as a new and distinct business.
Conclusion: The partition amounted to discontinuance of the business, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Section 25(3); the question was answered in the negative against the Revenue.