Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a Hindu undivided family is to be treated as ordinarily resident in British India under Section 4-B of the Indian Income-tax Act by reference to the residence of its manager, and whether the periods of residence of successive managers can be counted for that purpose.
Analysis: Section 4-B deemed a Hindu undivided family to be ordinarily resident if its manager was ordinarily resident in British India, and the manager's status had to be tested by the conditions applicable to an individual under Section 4-A(a). The family had continued in existence throughout the relevant period, and the earlier manager had admittedly been resident in British India. Nothing in Section 4-B indicated that only the residence of the manager during the year of account could be considered or that the residence of prior managers should be ignored. On the facts, the statutory conditions were satisfied.
Conclusion: The assessee was ordinarily resident in British India in the year of account, and the answer to the reference was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: The residential status of a Hindu undivided family under Section 4-B depends on the ordinary residence of its manager, and where the family continues without interruption, the residence of successive managers may be taken into account in applying the statutory test.