Court grants cenvat credit on rent-a-cab & insurance for exports, setting aside impugned order.

The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availability of cenvat credit on rent-a-cab, insurance on plant, machinery, equipment, and goods exported. Citing various legal precedents, the court held that the issues had been decisively settled in favor of the appellant, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.

---

---

Issues: Availability of cenvat credit on rent-a-cab, insurance on plant, machinery, equipment, and goods exported.

In the judgment delivered by Ms. Archana Wadhwa, the dispute revolved around the availability of cenvat credit on rent-a-cab, insurance on plant, machinery, equipment, and goods exported by the appellant. The Member (Judicial) noted that various decisions favored the assessee on these issues, citing cases such as Titan Industries Vs. CCE, Bangalore-I and CCE, Bangalore-III Vs. Stanzen Toyotetsu India. The Tribunal's decision in Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. CCE, Lucknow established that insurance on plant, machinery, and equipment should be considered an input service. Additionally, the High Court of Bombay in CCE, Nagpur Vs. Ultratech Cements Ltd. emphasized the nexus between catering services and the manufacture of the final product for cenvatable input service eligibility. The High Court of Karnataka in CCE&ST, LTU, Bangalore Vs. Micro Labs Ltd. held that service tax on all services directly or indirectly related to the final product qualifies for Cenvat credit. Moreover, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in Ambuja Cements Vs. Union of India confirmed the admissibility of insurance for cenvat credit.

The judgment concluded that since all the issues had been decisively settled in favor of the appellant based on previous legal precedents, there was no justification to uphold the impugned order. Consequently, the order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant.

---