Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether anticipated business profits arising from a development agreement in respect of land held as stock in trade could be brought to tax in the year of the agreement by treating the transaction as a taxable transfer and by enhancing closing stock.
Analysis: The land transferred under the development agreement was held as stock in trade and therefore did not constitute a capital asset. The provisions dealing with capital gains and the concept of transfer under the Income-tax Act had no application to the taxability of such notional business profits. For business income, the right received by the assessee was only a right to obtain and sell constructed area in future, and any profit could arise only when that right was actually exercised and realised. The settled rule of accounting requires closing stock to be valued at cost or market price, whichever is lower, and does not permit taxation of anticipated appreciation in stock value. The principles of conservatism and prudence, as well as the rule against taxing unrealised profits, barred immediate taxation of the notional gain.
Conclusion: The anticipated business profit could not be taxed in the relevant year, and the addition made on that basis was deleted.