Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether trustees carrying on the hotel business under the trust deed were chargeable to income-tax as an association of individuals under the charging provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and whether section 40 confined liability to the beneficiaries alone.
Analysis: The trust deed vested the business in the trustees, who alone controlled and carried it on, while the beneficiaries had no role in its management. The charging provisions in sections 3 and 10 fastened tax on income from business carried on by an assessee, and the phrase "other association of individuals" was held wide enough to include a body of trustees formed to carry on a business. Section 40 was treated as a machinery provision for special cases where tax is collected through a trustee for beneficiaries who are minors, lunatics, idiots, or non-residents; it did not restrict the general charging provisions or prevent assessment of trustees where they themselves carried on the business and received its profits.
Conclusion: The trustees were rightly assessable as an association of individuals on the profits of the hotel business, and section 40 did not make the beneficiaries alone liable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where trustees carry on a business and receive its profits in their own control, they may be assessed under the general charging provisions as an association of individuals, and a trustee-liability provision enacted for special collection cases does not exclude such liability.