Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether capital goods imported under Notification No. 126/94 dated 03-06-1994 were liable to duty despite failure to fulfil the export commitment, where the goods had been installed and used within the unit.
Analysis: The relevant condition in clause 3(b)(i) required duty to be paid only if the capital goods were not proved to have been installed or otherwise used within the unit or re-exported within the prescribed period. On the plain language of the notification, once the capital goods were installed and used for export production, the duty demand could not be sustained merely because the export commitment was not fully met. The separate question relating to consumables under clause 3(b)(iv) was not finally examined on merits and was only kept open by issuance of notice.
Conclusion: The duty demand in respect of the capital goods was not sustainable and the assessee succeeded on that issue.
Final Conclusion: The order recognises that installation and use of the imported capital goods satisfied the relevant notification condition, while the distinct issue under clause 3(b)(iv) remained pending for further hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification makes duty payable only if imported capital goods are not installed or otherwise used within the prescribed period, duty cannot be demanded once that condition is satisfied merely because the exporter later fails to meet the overall export commitment.