1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Decision on Penalty Deletion Under Section 271AAA</h1> The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271AAA of the Act. The case involved unaccounted income discovered ... - Issues involved: Appeal against order of Ld. CIT(A)-II Ahmedabad directing deletion of penalty u/s. 271AAA of the Act.Summary:The case involved a search u/s. 132 at the residence of a partner of a firm, leading to disclosure of unaccounted income. The AO levied a penalty of &8377; 5,20,500 u/s. 271AAA for failure to describe the manner in which the income was derived. However, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted the penalty, stating that section 271AAA is applicable only when a search u/s. 132 has been initiated, which was not the case for the appellant firm. The Ld. CIT(A) also noted that the conditions for penalty u/s. 271AAA were not fulfilled. The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, as no search operation u/s. 132 was conducted in the assessee's case, rendering section 271AAA inapplicable. The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty.