Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an addition treated as income under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for failure to prove the genuineness of hundi loans could be regarded as commercial profits available for distribution so as to attract section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The addition to the assessed income arose only because the assessee failed to establish the nature and source of the loan credits. There was no finding of deliberate inflation of expenditure or evidence that the amounts represented real business profits. An amount added merely on rejection of the explanation for a cash credit is not automatically available as commercial profit for dividend distribution. On that basis, the addition was treated as artificial, notional, or fictional income and not as surplus capable of supporting an order under section 104.
Conclusion: Section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not applicable on the facts, and the answer to the reference was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A sum brought to tax only because the assessee failed to prove a loan transaction is not, without more, commercial profit available for dividend distribution under section 104.