Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment made under section 23(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act was vitiated by the alleged invalidity of the notice under section 22(2) and the transfer of the case to the Special Circle, Nagpur.
Analysis: A notice under section 22(2) is a condition precedent for making a best judgment assessment under section 23(4) when the assessee fails to file a return. The case was transferred under section 5(7A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, which empowered the successor Income-tax Officer to proceed with the matter without re-issuing a notice already issued by the transferring officer. The contention that the transfer required publication in the Official Gazette was rejected, as section 5(6) had no application to such a transfer. The successor officer was therefore competent to rely on the earlier notice, and the assessee's failure to file the required return was sufficient to sustain the assessment.
Conclusion: The assessment under section 23(4) was valid, and the challenge based on the alleged invalidity of the notice and transfer failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a case is validly transferred under section 5(7A), the successor Income-tax Officer may act on a notice already issued by the transferor officer, and the assessee's failure to comply with section 22(2) justifies a best judgment assessment under section 23(4).