Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether differential duty could be demanded on imported crude palm oil and crude palm kernel oil on the ground that the goods, though cleared at concessional rate under exemption Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., were not used for the intended purpose because of shortage recorded on receipt.
Analysis: The disputed imports were made during June 2006 to March 2007 claiming exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. The authorities proceeded on the basis that shortage in the goods recorded at receipt amounted to non-use of the materials for the intended purpose and, on that footing, confirmed duty, interest and penalties. The Tribunal noted that an identical issue involving the same assessee had already been decided in its favour by an earlier final order. Since that view had attained finality, no reason was found to depart from it.
Conclusion: The demand of differential duty could not be sustained and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.