TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Bangalore Upholds CIT(A) Order Allowing Deduction Under Section 10A</h1> <h3>The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, LTU, Circle – 1, Bangalore Versus M/s. Intel Technology India Private Limited</h3> The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, LTU, Circle – 1, Bangalore Versus M/s. Intel Technology India Private Limited - TMI Issues:1. Appeal against CIT(A) order2. Allowance of deduction U/s. 10A3. Consistency with jurisdictional High Court judgmentIssue 1: Appeal against CIT(A) orderThe appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the CIT(A). The revenue contended that the CIT(A) order was against the law and facts of the case. However, during the hearing, it was noted that the CIT(A) had based the decision on the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in a specific case. The Supreme Court had dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the department against this judgment. Consequently, the ITAT found no fault with the CIT(A) order and rejected the grounds raised by the revenue.Issue 2: Allowance of deduction U/s. 10AOne of the grounds of appeal was related to the allowance of relief concerning deduction under Section 10A. The CIT(A) had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of M/s. Tata Elxsi Ltd. The revenue had not accepted this order and had filed an appeal before the Supreme Court. However, since the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating it was consistent with the jurisdictional High Court judgment.Issue 3: Consistency with jurisdictional High Court judgmentThe core issue revolved around the consistency of the CIT(A)'s decision with the judgment of the jurisdictional High Court. The ITAT noted that the CIT(A) had correctly adjudicated the matter in line with the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd. The ITAT found the CIT(A)'s decision to be in harmony with the High Court's ruling and therefore dismissed the revenue's appeal.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CIT(A) order, upholding the allowance of deduction U/s. 10A based on the jurisdictional High Court judgment. The ITAT's decision was rooted in the consistency of the CIT(A)'s findings with the High Court's ruling, leading to the rejection of the revenue's contentions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
